Revision petition sought setting aside of an attachment order and raising of attachment. On the trial Court's report, the suit was decided ex parte with decree passed, rendering the petition infructuous; it was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(MD).No.1167 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.R.P(MD)No.1167 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)No.5428 of 2017
1.R.Koodalingam 2.R.Rajalingam 3.R.Seenivasan ... Petitioners
1.Balamurugan ... 1st respondent / plaintiff 2.Paramasivam ... 2nd respondent / Defendant
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to call for the records relating to the order dated 24.03.2006 made in I.A.No.150/05 in O.S.No.166/04 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam and to set aside the same and to raise up the attachment made on 10.08.2005 in pursuant to the order dated 19.07.2005 in I.A.No.35/05 by allowing this revision.
1/4
C.R.P(MD).No.1167 of 2017
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Surianarayanan
For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
A report was called for from the trial Court namely the Subordinate Court, Uthamapalayam. The report is received from the trial Court which shows that the suit was decided ex parte, decree was passed. Therefore, the prayer in this petition has become infructuous.
11.11.2024
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No
pnn
2/4
C.R.P(MD).No.1167 of 2017
To
3/4
C.R.P(MD).No.1167 of 2017
G.ILANGOVAN, J.
pnn
ORDER IN C.R.P(MD)No.1167 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)No.5428 of 2017
11.11.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Koodalingam
R.Rajalingam
R.Seenivasan
Balamurugan
Paramasivam
G.Ilangovan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
