Dhanalakshmi, v. Suruliyammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, while hearing a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to set aside a decree, noted that a requisition for time extension was submitted by the lower court. The court directed the issuance of certified copies of the order dated 01.03.2024 to facilitate the disposal of the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD). No.1106 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Thursday, the Twenty Fourth day of October Two Thousand and Twenty Four
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R. SWAMINATHAN
CRP(MD). No.1106 of 2020
Dhanalakshmi
... Petitioner
Vs
1 Suruliyammal
- 2 Dhanalakshmi,
- 3 Ponnambalam,
4 Subramani,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for production of previous order should be accepted to dispose of the revision petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dhanalakshmi
- respondent
Suruliyammal
- respondent
Dhanalakshmi
- respondent
Ponnambalam
- respondent
Subramani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court