Disposed
A.Saraswathi, v. Gurudesigamani
Madras HCCRP(MD)/1056/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.12.2024…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1056 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.6140 of 2021
A.Saraswathi
... Petitioner
-vs.-
1.Gurudesigamani 2.S.K.Devi @ S.K.Vijayadevi 3.R.S.Ramya 4.Jayalakshmi ...Respondents
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to call for the records and set aside the fair and executable order, dated 10.06.2016 passed in the application in I.A.No.421 of 2011 in O.S.No.26 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District and Srivilliputhur.
For Petitioner :Mr.J.Barathan For R2 :Mr.M.Jothi Basu For R4 :No Appearance *****
________________ Page 1 of 3_
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner submitted that the judgment in O.S.No.26 of 2010
on the file of the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District and Srivilliputhur. was delivered on 23.11.2024.
2.Recording the same, as nothing survives, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.12.2024 Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No
cmr
To
The Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District and Srivilliputhur.
Page 2 of 3
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
cmr
C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1056 of 2021
16.12.2024
________________ Page 3 of 3_
A.Saraswathi
1.Gurudesigamani
2.S.K.Devi @ S.K.Vijayadevi
3.R.S.Ramya
4.Jayalakshmi
N.Senthilkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court