Arumugam.M v. Sellammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition challenging a decreetal order in a motor accident compensation case was withdrawn by the petitioner due to subsequent developments during its pendency, and dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.787 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
C.R.P. No. 787 of 2020 and C.M.P. No. 4217 of 2020
Arumugam. M ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Sellammal
- 2.Palanisamy
- 3.Periyasamy
- 4.Kalaiselvi
- 5.Kamachi
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arumugam. M
- respondent
Sellammal
- respondent
Palanisamy
- respondent
Periyasamy
- respondent
Kalaiselvi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court