Civil revision petition against an interlocutory order in a suit at Chidambaram. Counsel stated the main suit was decreed and endorsed the CRP as infructuous, so the High Court dismissed it as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP.No.778 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 19.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
C.R.P.No.778 of 2022 and CMP No.3901 of 2022
Arunachalam S/o Sivasami
... Petitioner
vs.
Jayachandran, S/o Sivanesan
... Respondent
Prayer in CRP : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 23.02.2022 passed in I.A.no.19 of 2021 in O.S.No.27 of 2021 on the file of II Addl.District Court, Chidambaram.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Baskaran For Respondent : Mr.T.Shanmugam
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
for the petitioner would state that the main suit in O.S.No.27 of 2021 was
decreed and thus, the civil revision petition has become infructuous. He
has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.
1/3
CRP.No.778 of 2022
learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
19.02.2024
Index :yes/No Speaking /Non speaking order vsi
To II Addl.District Court, Chidambaram.
2/3
CRP.No.778 of 2022
J.NISHA BANU, J.
vsi
C.R.P.No.778 of 2022
19.02.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arunachalam S/o Sivasami
Jayachandran, S/o Sivanesan
J.Nisha Banu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
