K. Jayanthi v. G. Raja
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed two Civil Revision Petitions as infructuous. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and the respondent's submission that possession was taken under a decree, rendering the revision without basis.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.[NPD].Nos.655 & 657 of 2023
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date 04.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.[NPD].Nos.655 & 675 of 2023
&
CMP.Nos.5126 & 5344 of 2023
K.Jayanthi . . . Petitioner in both CRPs
Versus
- G.Raja 2. G.Kothandam
- G.Dilipkumar
- P.Padma
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Civil Revision Petitions filed to set aside an order recalling a witness are maintainable when the respondent has taken possession via decree and the petitioner is absent with no significant r
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Jayanthi
- respondent
G.Raja
- respondent
G.Kothandam
- respondent
G.Dilipkumar
- respondent
P.Padma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court