Disposed

R.Srinivasan v. R.Sakunthala

Madras HC21 Dec 2024CRP/4622/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order in Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. Directs the trial court to dispose of a specific interim application within four weeks and the main partition suit within six months, citing the petitioner's non-cooperation as an impediment.

What did the court decide?

Directed trial court to dispose I.A.No.17 of 2011 within 4 weeks and the suit within 6 months thereafter.

R.Srinivasan Vs R.Sakunthala — Partition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P. (PD) No.4622 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.12.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.4622 of 2024

¶7

R.Srinivasan .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.R.Sakunthala 2.Indirani 3.Khadi Bhawan 4.Karthik 5.Shanmugam, 6.Suresh Tailor 7.Elango 8.Sri Electric Welding D.No. 22/4, Kavundae Gowder Street, No. 4, KK Pudur, Coimbatore 38. 9.Shobha Gas Welding D.No. 23/4, Kavundae Gowder Street, No. 4, KK Pudur, Coimbatore 38. 10.Shanmugam 11.R.Venkatesan 12.Sangeetha 13.Jagadeesan 14.Karuppiah 15.Gangadharan 16.C.Dharani 17.G.Bharathi .. Respondents

¶10

Page 1 of 4

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

C.R.P. (PD) No.4622 of 2024

¶13

Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Trial Court to dispose the suit in OS No. 1193 of 2010 pending on the file of III Additional Sub Court, Coimbatore within a stipulated Period.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Naganathan

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This civil revision petition seeks for expeditious disposal of O.S.No.1193 of 2010 on the file of the learned III Additional Subordinate

¶17

Judge at Coimbatore. The said suit is one for partition and separate possession.

¶18

When the matter came up for admission, I called for a report from the learned III Additional Subordinate Judge at Coimbatore.

¶19

The learned Judge has submitted a report stating that, as the respondent in I.A.No.17 of 2011 is not cooperating for the disposal, he is unable to proceed further in the matter. The civil revision petitioner is the said respondent. On the one hand, he cannot plead that the suit is pending and on the other hand, not cooperating with the court for the purpose of disposal.

¶20

Page 2 of 4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

C.R.P. (PD) No.4622 of 2024

¶23

The learned Trial Judge is requested to dispose of I.A.No.17 of 2011

¶24

within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order and thereafter, take up the suit for disposal. The suit shall be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of disposal of I.A.No.17 of 2011.

¶25

With the aforesaid directions, this civil revision petition is ordered.

¶26

No costs.

¶27

21.12.2024

¶28

nl Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶29

¶30

The III Additional Sub Court, Coimbatore

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Page 3 of 4

¶33

C.R.P. (PD) No.4622 of 2024

¶34

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.,

¶35

¶36

Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.4622 of 2024

¶37

21.12.2024

¶38

Page 4 of 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Srinivasan v. R.Sakunthala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Srinivasan v. R.Sakunthala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Barathi Vs R. Kumar

Kiruthika Vs S.M.Ashwinrajaa

Bhuvaneswari Vs M.Parthiban

M. Subramani Vs Dhanalakshmi

V.Deekshitha Vs R.Aravinth

S.Palanisamy Vs K.M. Chinnasamy @ K.P.M. Chinnu Gounder