A.R.Interiors v. v.Geetha
Case brief
What is this about?
This limitation order dismisses the civil revision petition as infructuous since the main appeal already dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD).No.4521 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2024
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.4521 of 2017 & C.M.P.Nos.21333 of 2017
A.R.Interiors Prop. Y.B.Rajkumar
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.V.Geetha 2.Rajeswari ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to fair and decreetal order of the learned Principal District Judge, Salem dated 30.06.2017 in I.A.No.193 of 2015 in CMA.No.26 of 2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondents : Ms.Jeevitha for Mr.R.Nalliappan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition is maintainable after the main appeal has been dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.R.Interiors Prop. Y.B.Rajkumar
- respondent
1.V.Geetha
- respondent
2.Rajeswari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court