Allowed

D. Dhanalakshmi v. Gomathi

Madras HC17 Dec 2024CRP/3516/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petition seeking expeditious disposal of an interim injunction application in a pending suit. On the trial judge's report, the High Court directed the District Munsif, Madhavaram to dispose of both pending interlocutory applications within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Munsif, Madhavaram to dispose of I.A.Nos.2 of 2023 & 1 of 2024 within eight weeks; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

D. Dhanalakshmi Vs Gomathi — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.(PD)No.3516 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17.12.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)No.3516 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.19071 of 2024

D.Dhanalakshmi

.. Petitioner

Gomathi

.. Respondent

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for a direction to the learned District Munsif, Madhavaram to dispose of the petition filed for interim injunction in I.A.No.2 of 2023 in O.S.No.45 of 2023 pending on its file within a time fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ravichandran

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

C.R.P.(PD)No.3516 of 2024

¶18

The civil revision petition seeks for expeditious disposal of

¶19

I.A.No.2 of 2023 in O.S.No.45 of 2023 on the file of the learned District Munsif at Madhavaram.

¶20

When the matter came up for admission on 02.09.2024, I called

¶21

for a report from the learned Trial Judge to state as to how long he requires to dispose of the said I.A.

¶22

The learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Madhavaram (FAC) has submitted a report stating that I.A.No.2 of 2023 is filed seeking for interim injunction along with O.S.No.45 of 2023. The respondent/defendant had filed I.A.No.1 of 2024 for rejection of plaint, which has been posted for enquiry on 27.09.2024. The report further states that both the applications are pending. The learned Judge prays for a direction may be given to dispose of the said I.A. within a reasonable time limit.

¶23

4.Taking into consideration the report of the learned Trial Judge,

¶24

there shall be a direction to the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Madhavaram (FAC) to dispose of I.A.Nos.2 of 2023 & 1 of

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/4

¶27

C.R.P.(PD)No.3516 of 2024

¶28

2024 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

¶29

this order.

¶30

Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands ordered. No costs.

¶31

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶32

17.12.2024

¶33

Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶34

¶35

¶36

The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram (FAC).

¶37

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/4

¶40

C.R.P.(PD)No.3516 of 2024

¶41

¶42

C.R.P.(PD)No.3516 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.19071 of 2024

¶43

17.12.2024

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

4/4

D. Dhanalakshmi v. Gomathi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D. Dhanalakshmi v. Gomathi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. Vs M.Jayachandran(Died), 1.J.SARAYANYA

Jagan Mohan Vs Jagannathan

Ajeesh Kumar S Vs Shilaja T R

S.Sathyashree Vs Mamata Laddha

Baskar Vs Aruna Devi

Mahalingam Vs Amaravathi