The learned counsel for petitioners would submit that the revision petitioners are the tenants in respect of petition properties in RLTOP Nos.2 and 3 of 2023 and RLTOP. No. 823 of 2022, against whom, the landlord filed a petition for eviction on the ground of possession under Sec.10(3) (a), (iii) and 10(3) (c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973. In fact, already RLTOPNo. 771 of 2015 was filed by the respondent, the joint family property of Mohammed Noordeen and 6 others and the petitioners are occupying one of the premises respectively as tenants from the year of 1985. After the purchase, the family members of landlord demolished the original superstructure in the year 1979 and constructed a new building, wherein these petitioner have occupied one of the shops. Subsequently, the said RLTOP.No. 771 of 2015 is pending before the Small Causes Court was dismissed as not pressed. Suppressing that fact, the present R.L.T.O.P.s were filed with false statement stating that he was inducted as a tenant only on 05.03.2018 and called upon them to enter into an agreement, for that they refused. Accordingly, the cause of action arose and the present R.L.T.O.P. No.823 of 2022 and R.L.T.O.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2023 was filed. But they are joint owners as per the previous petition filed in RLTOP No.771 of 2015, but suppressing the said fact, the present petitions were filed. In fact, the nomenclature of the petitioners is not properly
