that the respondent/landlord purchased the property for a valid consideration from his vendor and after the purchase, he intimated about his purchase to the revision petitioners/tenants and also issued a letter to the revision petitioners/tenants calling upon them to execute a fresh tenancy. But, the revision petitioners/tenants failed to execute a tenancy agreement under Sec.4 of the New Act. As there is no written agreement, as per the proviso clause to Sec.4 of New Act, it empowers the landlord and tenant to apply for a termination of tenancy on the ground of termination under Sec.21(2)(a) of the TNRRL Act. Before the Rent Controller, though the landlord prayed for eviction under Sec.21(2)(a) of the TNRRL Act claiming to execute termination of tenancy and also on the ground of default of rent, but on hearing both sides, rent controller found that there is no valid registered tenancy agreement between landlord and tenants. Even though the tenants are also aware of the purchase made by the present landlord from the erstwhile landlord, the Rent Controller granted an order of eviction on the ground of termination under Sec.21(2)(a) of the Act alone. Against which, an appeal was filed in RLTA No. 31 of 2021. The appellate tribunal also independently
