The petitioner sought to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Single Judge of the Madras High Court granted permission to withdraw, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition granted; petition stood dismissed as withdrawn; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)No.2859 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.(PD)No.2859 of 2024 and
C.M.P.No.15209 of 2024
P.Gopalakrishnan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.P.Subramanian
2.P.Devarajan .. Respondents
Prayer : The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the entire records pertaining to the order, dated 15.03.2024, passed in I.A.No.18 of 2024 in O.S.No.22 of 2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif at Perundurai and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ganesan
For Respondents : Mr.V.S.Kesavan
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court
to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement
in the bundle to that effect.
Page No 1 of 3
C.R.P.(PD)No.2859 of 2024
stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
07.08.2024
mkn2 Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No
Page No 2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(PD)No.2859 of 2024
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
mkn2
To
The learned District Munsif, Perundurai
C.R.P.(PD)No.2859 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.15209 of 2024
07.08.2024
Page No 3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
P. Gopalakrishnan
P. Subramanian
P. Devarajan
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
