Sujatha v. Sujatha
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought direction under Article 227 for the Principal Munsif Court to dispose of an execution petition pending since 2017. The High Court found the case stalled due to adjournments and directed the court to conclude the matter within three months.
What did the court decide?
Direction issued to the District Munsif Court, Sholinganallur to dispose of the execution petition within three months.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.2842 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
C.R.P.No.2842 of 2024
Sujatha
Rep by Power of Attorney Mr.P.S.Sudar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.M.Sujatha
2.R.Susainathan
Kavitha (Died)
- 3.Adithiaa Educational Trust,
An Education Trust having its office at
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to direct the lower court to dispose of a pending execution petition?
Whether the delay and lack of progress in the execution proceedings justified judicial intervention?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sujatha
- respondent
M.Sujatha
- respondent
R.Susainathan
- respondent
Kavitha (Died)
- respondent
Adithiaa Educational Trust
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court