Civil revision petition filed under Article 227 to set aside a decree was dismissed as infructuous. The consequence was the closure of a connected miscellaneous petition.
The civil revision petition was dismissed as infructuous. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD).No.223 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.06.2024
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.223 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.1851 of 2023
1.D.Santhamani @ Santhi 2.D.Pradeepkumar 3.D.Sanju Vikasini
... Petitioners
-Versus-
S.Vijayanandan
... Respondent
Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.01.2023 made in I.A.No.11 of 2022 in O.S.No.456 of 2018 on the file of the II Additional District & Sessions Court, Tiruppur.
For Petitioners : Mr.I.Abrar Mohamed Abdullah For Respondent : Mr.K.Myilsamy
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners reports that the civil
1 of 4
C.R.P.(PD).No.223 of 2023
revision petition has become infructuous. He has also made an effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.06.2024
nl Index : yes / no Neutral Citation : yes / no Speaking / Non Speaking Order
C.R.P.(PD).No.223 of 2023
To
C.R.P.(PD).No.223 of 2023
nl
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
C.R.P.(PD).No.223 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.1851 of 2023
04.06.2024
1. D.Santhamani @ Santhi, 2.D.Pradeepkumar, 3.D.Sanju Vikasini
S.Vijayanandan
V. Lakshminarayan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
