Nataraj(Died) v. Kamalam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging the lower court's order refusing to condone a 999-day delay in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2171 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2171 of 2021 and CMP.No.16455 of 2021
1.Nataraj
[died vide separate sheet effects cause title accepted vide Court order dated 17.09.2021 made in CMP.No.15029 of 2021 in CRP.Sr.No.51937 of 2021 GCSJ)]
- 2.Krishnasamy
- 3.Krishnaveni
- 4.Rajasekaran
- 5.Yuvarani
- 6.Kamala
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the civil revision petition against the dismissal of the application to condone a delay of 999 days in setting aside an ex-parte decree.
Whether the petitioners demonstrated sufficient cause for the huge delay within the meaning of Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nataraj (others)
- respondent
Kamalam
- respondent
Rangammal
- respondent
Lakshmi
- respondent
Rukumani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court