Vetrivel (Died) Santhi v. T.K.Dhinakaran
Case brief
What is this about?
Registry error in a civil revision petition order copy showed a deceased petitioner's name instead of his wife, who had been substituted by court order. The court directed the Registry to issue a fresh order copy reflecting the cause-title correction.
What did the court decide?
Fresh corrected order copy directed to be issued reflecting substitution of petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.1714 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.1714 of 2024
Vetrivel (Died) Santhi .. Petitioner (Cause title accepted vide court order dated 12.04.2024 made in CMP.No.4796 of 2024 in CRP.SR15562 of 2024)
Versus
T.K.Dhinakaran .. Respondent
ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for being mentioned”, pursuant to a letter written by the learned Principal District Judge, Salem in D.No.3458/2025 dated 30.04.2025.
- The learned Principal District Judge pointed out that the order had been passed in favour of one Vetrivel, who had passed away on 19.10.2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vetrivel (Died) Santhi
- respondent
T.K.Dhinakaran
Coram
V. Lakshminarayanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court