Disposed

Chokkalingam v. Ranjitha

Madras HC25 Apr 2024CRP/1300/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, second defendant in a title suit pending since 2021, sought a direction for expeditious disposal. The High Court directed the District Munsif, Sankarapuram to complete the suit within four months from June 3, 2024 and disposed of the revision petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Munsif, Sankarapuram to complete O.S.No.45 of 2021 within four months from 03.06.2024; revision petition disposed, no costs.

Chokkalingam Vs Ranjitha — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.No.1300 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.04.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

C.R.P.No.1300 of 2024

¶7

Chokkalingam ... Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.Ranjitha 2.Pazhaniyammal ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of

¶11

India, to direct the learned District Munsif, Sankarapuram to dispose of the

¶12

suit in O.S.No.45 of 2021 within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Balamanikandan

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The petitioner/2^nd defendant in O.S.No.45 of 2021 has filed this Civil

¶16

Revision Petition to direct the learned District Munsif, Sankarapuram to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2021 within a time frame.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.1 of 4

¶18

C.R.P.No.1300 of 2024

¶19

2.Notice ordered to the 1 st respondent/plaintiff and 2 nd respondent/1 st defendant on 25.04.2024. Though notice served, none appeared for them. As

¶20

regards 2 nd respondent is concerned, she has been set exparte by the trial Court.

¶21

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2021 filed on 15.03.2021, thereafter it was pending for sometime for service of notice and for filing written statement. Finally, due to non-filing of written statement by the defendants, they were set exparte on 20.10.2021. In the meanwhile, the evidence recorded. He further submitted that the 1 st respondent/plaintiff was set exparte and to set aside the same, the 1st respondent/plaintiff filed I.A.No.1005 of 2022 in O.S.No.45 of 2021 and the same was allowed. Then the plaintiff filed written statement and now it has been posted for issues. The petitioner herein is a purchaser of the property from 2 nd respondent/1 st defendant. Now the 1 st respondent/plaintiff claiming herself to be a daughter of second wife of Navaan, filed the suit which is only for the purpose of undue demand. The only requirement of the petitioner is that the trial to be completed and suit to be disposed within a stipulated

¶22

period. Hence, prays for direction for completion of the suit.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2 of 4

¶24

C.R.P.No.1300 of 2024

¶25

4.Considering the submissions and on perusal of the materials, this

¶26

Court directs the learned District Munsif, Sankarapuram to complete the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2021 within a period of four months from the 3 rd June, 2024.

¶27

5.With the above direction, this civil revision petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶28

25.04.2024

¶29

Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶30

vv2 To

¶31

The District Munsif, Sankarapuram.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.3 of 4

¶33

C.R.P.No.1300 of 2024

¶34

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

¶35

vv2

¶36

C.R.P.No.1300 of 2024

¶37

25.04.2024

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4 of 4

Chokkalingam v. Ranjitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chokkalingam v. Ranjitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Narayana Reddy Vs Harish

U.Udhaya Legha Vs Ramani

Aishwarya Sridhar Vs Harihara Venkataraman Balasubramanian

Krishnan (DECEASED)1.Thirunavukkarasu K Vs Muniyan

M.Shekar Vs K.J.Vijay

M/S. Dazzle Beauty Parlour Vs Kalavathy