T.Sathaiah v. v.Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a pending suit was dismissed as infructuous on the petitioner's own endorsement that the petition had become infructuous; the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. No substantive issue was decided.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD).No.1222 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.(PD).No.1222 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.9420 of 2021
T.Sathaiah ... Petitioner
vs
1.V.Ramesh
2.N.Chidambaram
3.The Sub Inspector, Sub Registrar Office, Periamet, Chennai – 600 003 (Given up in suit) ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 20.03.2020, in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.5367 of 2015 on the file of XVth Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.Sathaiah
- respondent
V.Ramesh
- respondent
N.Chidambaram
- respondent
The Sub Inspector, Sub Registrar Office, Periamet, Chennai – 600 003
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court