Disposed

A.P.Nagaraj v. D.Mani

Madras HC28 Nov 2024CRP/1201/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil revision petition challenging a docket order leasing a flat, the High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of the matter by ordering the lower court to allow vacation of possession upon payment of a specific sum based on an affidavit of undertaking filed by the petitioner's counsel.

What did the court decide?

Ordered the XI Small Causes Court to allow the petitioner to hand over possession of the flat upon payment of Rs.1,90,000/- as per the undertaking filed.

A.P.Nagaraj Vs D.Mani — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.No.1201 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 28.11.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

C.R.P.No.1201 of 2024

¶7

A.P.Nagaraj .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.D.Mani 2.P.Selvam .. Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the docket order dated 19.01.2024 and direct the XI Small Causes Court, Chennai to re-mark the Ex.R3 (Lease deed dated 01.07.2006).

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Anilkumar

¶12

For Respondent 1 : Mr.R.Thiagarajan

¶13

For Respondent 2 : No appearance

¶14

ORDER

¶15

When the revision was taken up for arguments, I heard Mr.V.Anil

¶16

Kumar for the petitioner and Mr.R.Thiagarajan for the first respondent.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/4

¶19

C.R.P.No.1201 of 2024

¶20

Mr.V.Anil Kumar stated that if the amount of Rs.1,90,000/- is

¶21

returned by the first respondent to the civil revision petitioner in terms of the lease deed that had been entered into by one Mr.S.Govind, power of attorney of the respondent, the petitioner will be willing to vacate and hand over possession. Hence, the matter was adjourned to enable Mr.V.Anil Kumar to file an affidavit of undertaking.

¶22

Mr.V.Anil Kumar has filed an affidavit of undertaking today stating that he will vacate and hand over possession on or before 30.01.2025 subject to the payment of Rs.1,90,000/-. It also states that the petitioner will hand over possession of Flat No.G-2, “Anandham Enclave”, Ground Floor, Plot No.2, Indira Gandhi II Cross Street, Avvai Nagar, Choolaimedu, Chennai.

¶23

The affidavit of undertaking has been served on Ms.Vasudha Thiagarajan, who represents the respondent. She has no objection for the time being granted to hand over possession. She states that the first respondent will return the amount of Rs.1,90,000/-, the day the petitioner hands over the keys of the property.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/4

¶26

C.R.P.No.1201 of 2024

¶27

The statement of both counsels and affidavit of undertaking is recorded. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is ordered in terms of affidavit of undertaking.

¶28

Call this revision on 30.01.2025 to report compliance.

¶29

28.11.2024

¶30

¶31

Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no

¶32

¶33

The XI Small Causes Court, Chennai

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

C.R.P.No.1201 of 2024

¶37

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶38

¶39

C.R.P.No.1201 of 2024

¶40

28.11.2024

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

A.P.Nagaraj v. D.Mani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.P.Nagaraj v. D.Mani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arokiamary Mont Morency(Died) Vs Mont Morency Francis

Krishnamoorthy Vs K.Eswari

R.Alamelu Vs Mannar Udayar

Hakkim Vs Sagira Banu

A.P.Nagaraj Vs D.Mani

Gobalakichenin Vs Sankaranarayanan