Disposed

Purushothaman v. Velmurugan

Madras HC26 Mar 2024CRP/1108/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A revision petition sought a direction to the Principal Sub-Court, Kallakurichi to expedite a 2021 suit for title declaration and injunction, which had stagnated after filing of the written statement. The court disposed of the petition by directing expeditious disposal, without notice and without costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to Principal Sub-Court, Kallakurichi to dispose of O.S.No.202 of 2021 as expeditiously as possible; petition disposed of without costs.

Purushothaman Vs Velmurugan — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.No.1108 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

CRP.No.1108 of 2024

¶7

Purushothaman ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.Velmurugan 2.Ranganayaki 3.Kalaiselvi 4.Maheswari ...Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to direct the learned District Principal Sub-Court, Kallakurichi to dispose the suit in O.S.No.202 of 2021 within the time stipulated.

¶11

For Petitioner :M/s.S.N.Subramani

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

C.R.P.No.1108 of 2024

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to Principal Sub-

¶17

Court, Kallakurichi to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.202 of 2021 within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶18

Having regard to the limited prayer made by the petitioner in this

¶19

revision, this Court is inclined to dispose of the same even without notice to the respondents.

¶20

The petitioner is the 4^th defendant in the suit. The 1^st respondent herein filed a suit for declaration of his title and injunction. He also sought for a declaration that settlement deed executed by deceased husband of 1^st defendant in her favour was null and void. He further prayed for a declaration

¶21

of sale deed executed by 1^st defendant in favour of petitioner herein/4^th defendant was also null and void.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P.No.1108 of 2024

¶25

A perusal of e-court status filed in the typed set of papers would suggest that written statement was filed in the suit as early as 18.03.2022 and thereafter, the matter has been adjourned from time to time for framing of issues without any progress. In view of the fact that suit is of the year 2021, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to Principal Sub-Court, Kallakurichi to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible.

¶26

With this direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No

¶27

costs.

¶28

26.03.2024

¶29

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No nr To The Principal Sub-Court, Kallakurichi

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

C.R.P.No.1108 of 2024

¶33

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

¶34

¶35

CRP.No.1108 of 2024

¶36

26.03.2024

¶37

4/4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Purushothaman v. Velmurugan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purushothaman v. Velmurugan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Ravichandran Vs The Branch Manager

Jayalakshmi Vs Santhammal

Rajkumar Vs Saranya

P.Jenmarkkani Vs the Chit Manager

M Shivakumar Vs M Vijayakumar

R.Thirunavukkarasu Vs v.Saranya