Civil Revision Petition against an interlocutory order in O.S.No.290 of 2008 was withdrawn on the petitioner's counsel's endorsement seeking leave. The High Court granted leave and dismissed the revision as withdrawn, closing the connected miscellaneous petition with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.1087 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
CRP.No.1087 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.5647 of 2024
D.Jayabalaji ... Petitioner
Vs.
A.Shanmugam ...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 11.10.2023 made in I.A.No.02 of 2023 in O.S.No.290 of 2008 on the file of the learned II Additional SubOrdinate Judge, Additional Sub-Court at Salem by allowing the above Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner :Mr.K.Anbarasan
1/3
C.R.P.No.1087 of 2024
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
25.03.2024
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No nr
To The learned II Additional Sub-Ordinate Judge, Salem
2/3
C.R.P.No.1087 of 2024
S.SOUNTHAR , J.
nr
CRP.No.1087 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.5647 of 2024
25.03.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Jayabalaji
A.Shanmugam
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
