Disposed

N. Senthil Arasu Pandian v. Ilakkia Singaram

Madras HC8 Apr 2024CRP/1034/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two civil revision petitions by the husband seeking speedy disposal of his divorce petition and the wife's restitution petition. Parties reached a memorandum of understanding to withdraw both petitions and file for mutual-consent divorce with a property settlement; revision petitions disposed.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed on parties' memorandum of understanding to mutually withdraw cases and seek Section 13-B divorce with property settlement.

N. Senthil Arasu Pandian Vs Ilakkia Singaram — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 08.04.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶7

N.Senthil Arasu Pandian ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Ilakkia Singaram ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER in C.R.P.No.1034 of 2024 : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Lower Court to speedily dispose of H.M.O.P.No.2688 of 2018 on the file of the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶11

PRAYER in C.R.P.No.1036 of 2024 : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Lower Court to speedily dispose of H.M.O.P.No.2671 of 2021 on the file of the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶12

For Petitioner in both CRPs : Mr.C.Gunasekaran For Respondent in both CRPs : Mr.A.Arulmozhi

¶13

Page No.1 of 9

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶16

COMMON ORDER

¶17

The petitioner in both the civil revision petitions is the husband, who filed H.M.O.P.No.2688 of 2018 before the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai, for divorce. The respondent herein is the wife, who filed H.M.O.P.No.2671 of 2021 before the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai, for restitution of conjugal rights. Both these civil revision petitions filed seeking direction for speedy and early disposal of above said H.M.O.Ps. by the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶18

2.Today, the petitioner and the respondent appeared before this Court and submitted that they entered into a memorandum of understanding to resolve the issue between them amicably by the petitioner/husband compensating the respondent/wife to her satisfaction and both of them agreed to withdraw the cases filed by them against each other. Both the petitioner and the respondent intend to file a divorce petition under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. A scanned reproduction of the Memorandum of Understanding is as follows:

¶19

Page No.2 of 9

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶22

Page No.3 of 9

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶25

Page No.4 of 9

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶28

Page No.5 of 9

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶31

Page No.6 of 9

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶34

Page No.7 of 9

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶37

3.After withdrawing the petitions in H.M.O.P.No.2688 of 2018 and H.M.O.P.No.2671 of 2021 on the file of the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai, both the petitioner and the respondent agreed to file a petition for divorce by mutual consent and the petitioner/husband to settle the property in favour of the respondent/wife as per the undertaking.

¶38

4.In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petitions stand disposed of. The Memorandum of Understanding forms part of the order.

¶39

08.04.2024

¶40

Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No cse Note: Issue order copy on 08.04.2024

¶41

Page No.8 of 9

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶44

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. cse

¶45

¶46

The Judge, IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶47

C.R.P.Nos.1034 and 1036 of 2024

¶48

08.04.2024

¶49

Page No.9 of 9

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N. Senthil Arasu Pandian v. Ilakkia Singaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N. Senthil Arasu Pandian v. Ilakkia Singaram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.N. Sanghani (Died) 1. Anitha Kishorchandra N. Sanghani Vs Kiran Puran Batavia (Died) 1. Nilesh Puran Batavia

J.Mohan Vs D.Sukumar

S. Mala Devi Vs G. Ravi

M. Rajendran Vs M. Veera Raghavan

Natarajan(Died), 1.Muthu Vs S.Venkatesan

Sree Jaya Nair Vs the State Rep by Its