Civil revision petition dismissed automatically because the petitioner failed to pay batta for issuing notice to the respondent as directed by the court's earlier order. No costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.1018 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P. No.1018 of 2013 and
C.M.P. No.1 of 2013
P.R. Palanisamy ... Petitioner
vs.
S. Vasantha W/o. P. Subramaniam ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
India, praying to call for the records in respect of order made in I.A. No.116 of 2012 in O.S.No.74 of 2011 dated 21.11.2012 passed by the learned
I Additional District Judge, Coimbatore and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr. Thanjai P.N. Chezhian For Respondent : Dismissed vide Court.
O R D E R
It is seen from the records that this Court by order dated 08.02.2023
directed the petitioner to pay batta on or before 22.02.2023 for taking notice
1/3
C.R.P.No.1018 of 2013
to the respondents with default clause. The petitioner failed to comply with
the said order.
14 .03.2024
Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No mjs
To
The I Additional District Judge, Coimbatore.
2/3
C.R.P.No.1018 of 2013
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
mjs
C.R.P.No.1018 of 2013
14.03.2024
3/3
P.R. Palanisamy
S. Vasantha W/o. P. Subramaniam
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
