Eswaran v. Subramaniam
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed the civil revision petition challenging the dismissal of an application for an Advocate Commissioner to ascertain the age of a promissory note and stamp, noting no reliable scientific technology exists for such determination.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.1013 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
CRP.No.1013 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.5242 of 2024
P.Eswaran ... Petitioner
Vs.
K.Subramaniam ...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.30 of 2017 dated 02.01.2024 of the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge, Thiruchengode.
For Petitioner :M/s.S.Suneetha
ORDER
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether technology is available to determine the age of ink or document paper.
Whether the age of document paper is a sole determining factor for execution date.
Whether the Trial Court rightly dismissed the application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Eswaran
- respondent
K.Subramaniam
Coram
S.Sounthar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court