P.Ammavasai v. G.Vidya
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought extension of time for the lower court to dispose of the case. The Court granted a final extension of six months to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to comply with the earlier order dated 14.02.2024.
What did the court decide?
Extension of six months granted to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Criminal Original Jurisdiction
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAYOF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
CRL RC(MD) NO. 871 of 2023
P.Ammavasai Petitioner Vs 1.G.Vidya 2.Jeyanthimala 3.Uthayasuryan 4.Vasuki 5.Pounthai 6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Theni. (Crime No.4/2012) Respondent Prayer:
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under section 397 R/w 401 CPC to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the learned Chief judicial Magistrate, Theni, in Crl.M.P.No.10093/2022 in Spl.C.No.01/2017, dated 08.06.2023
and set aside the same and thus render justice.
ORDER :-
This Petition coming upon for hearing on this day under the caption ''Extension of time for 'Lower Court' and upon perusing the earlier order dated 14/02/2024 and the requisition submitted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Theni in D.No.1429/2025 dated 14/07/2025 seeking further three months time to dispose of the case in Spl.c.No.01 of 2017 this Court made the following order.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an extension of time should be granted to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to dispose of the pending case?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Ammavasai
- respondent
G.Vidya
- respondent
Jeyanthimala
- respondent
Uthayasuryan
- respondent
Vasuki
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court