S.Noornisha v. K.Selva
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision against appellate order imposing condition to deposit 20% of compensation for interim bail in cheque bounce case. High Court upheld order citing Supreme Court precedent on exceptional circumstances.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Revision case dismissed; impugned appellate order confirming 20% deposit condition and granting interim bail confirmed.
What the court decided
Crl.R.C(MD)No.672 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 10.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Crl.R.C(MD)No.672 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6889 of 2024
S.Noornisha ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant
Vs. K.Selvan ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 25.04.2024 made by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Court, Tiruchirappalli in Cr.M.P.No.1559 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.22 of 2024 and set aside the condition directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Srirangam within 60 days.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.K.Jeya Seelan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned appellate judge erred in imposing the condition to deposit 20% of the compensation amount before granting interim bail suspension of sentence?
Whether the imposition of the condition to deposit 20% of compensation falls within the exceptional circumstances delineated by the Supreme Court?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Noornisha
- respondent
K. Selvan
Coram
K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court