Criminal revision against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed a memo stating the matter was settled in full by payment of Rs.1,00,000/-. Recording the settlement, the High Court disposed of the revision and set aside the conviction and sentence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.R.C.No.925 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
CRL.R.C.No.925 of 2019
M.Rajan
… Petitioner / Accused
vs.
M.Baskar … Respondent / Complainant
PRAYER : This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 31.07.2019 passed in Crl.Appeal No.44 of 2019 on the file of Principal Sessions Court, Erode, confirming the judgment dated 10.01.2019 passed in S.T.C.No.228 of 2016 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, FTC-1, Erode, whereby the petitioner is convicted for the offence u/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to undergo 1 year simple imprisonment and to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation to the complainant in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balaganesh For Respondent : Mr.Karthik for Mr.N.Krishnamoorthy (appeared through video
conferencing)
ORDER
The revision petitioner/accused and Mr.K.Balaganesh, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused are present.
1/4
CRL.R.C.No.925 of 2019
represents through video conferencing along with the respondent/complainant.
26.02.2024
Index : Yes/No ssn
To:
2/4
CRL.R.C.No.925 of 2019
High Court, Madras.
R.KALAIMATHI, J.,
ssn
CRL.R.C.No.925 of 2019
3/4
CRL.R.C.No.925 of 2019
26.02.2024
4/4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M.Rajan
M.Baskar
R.Kalaimathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
