Dismissed

Beaula Samuel v. Malliga

Madras HC11 Dec 2024CRL RC/715/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Revision under sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. against conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not pressed; counsel made an endorsement of withdrawal, and the revision was dismissed as withdrawn with any interim order vacated. Decides no question of law.

What did the court decide?

None granted; revision dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's endorsement, interim order vacated.

Beaula Samuel Vs Malliga — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.R.C.No.715 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED

¶6

Crl.R.C.No.715 of 2022

¶7

Mrs.Beaula Samuel

¶8

... Revision Petitioner

¶9

/vs/

¶10

Mrs.Malliga ... Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Criminal Revision Case filed under sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C.,to set aside the judgment dated 02.03.2022 passed by the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram District @ Chengalpattu in Crl.A.No.39 of 2013 in so far as erroneously confirming the conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Alandur, Chennai in C.C.No.82 of 2011, dated 12.11.2013, convicting the appellant/accused herein under section 357(3) Cr.P.C., for the offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo one month simple imprisonment for an offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

¶12

For Revision Petitioner ... Ms.Radhika

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/3

¶15

Crl.R.C.No.715 of 2022

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Ms.Radhika, learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner, on

¶18

instructions from his client, submitted that the Revision Petitioner do not want to press this Revision Petition and wants to withdraw the same and to that effect, she has made an endorsement in the court bundle.

¶19

Accordingly, in view of the statmenet made by the learned counsel

¶20

for the Revision Petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

The file is consigned to record. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

¶22

11.12.2024

¶23

msr Index: yes/no Internet:yes/no To

¶24

The Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram District @ Chengalpattu

¶25

The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Alandur, Chennai

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/3

¶28

Crl.R.C.No.715 of 2022

¶29

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

¶30

msr

¶31

Crl.R.C.No.715 of 2022

¶32

11.12.2024

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/3

Beaula Samuel v. Malliga

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Beaula Samuel v. Malliga

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Raja Vs State Rep by

Manivannan Vs the State Rep by Its

K.Elangovan Vs P.Krishnan

Sakthikumar Vs Jaisankar

Kvr Karnan Vs Jaisankar

A.Govindaraj Vs M.Nandakumar