V.S.Gunaseelan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision seeking quashment of an order denying interim custody of seized wildlife articles. Court found genuineness of possession certificate debatable and not for judicial decision at this stage.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed; respondent directed to preserve seized articles.
What the court decided
Crl.RC.No.570 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.RC.No.570 of 2021 and Crl.MP.SR.No.37603 of 2021
V.S.Gunaseelan
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State represented by the, Forest Range Officer, Pollachi Forest Range, Pollachi. ...Respondent
Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the order dated 05.10.2018 in C.M.P.No.4045 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pollachi and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent to return the articles seized from the petitioner in W.L.O.R.No.3 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : M/s.AL.Ganthimathi
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.S.Gunaseelan
- respondent
The State
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court