Allowed

Umasankar v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC18 Mar 2024CRL RC/477/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal revision petition filed by a vehicle owner seeking the return of his Bajaj Auto seized under the NDPS Act. Relying on Apex Court precedents, the Court set aside the lower court's dismissal, directing return of the vehicle subject to a personal bond, proof of ownership, and an undertaking to produce the vehicle.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order was set aside, and the lower court was directed to return the seized vehicle to the petitioner upon execution of a personal bond, submission of ownership documents, and an undertaki

Umasankar Vs the State Rep.by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.R.C.No.477 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 1 8.03 .2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

Crl.R.C.No.477 of 2024

¶7

Umasankar ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar, P.E.W. Police Station, Chennai District. Crime No.133 of 2023 . ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.9100 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Special Judge NDPS Act Cases at Chennai, dated 18.12.2023 and consequently direct the respondent to return the property to the petitioner, vehicle bearing TN-02-AH-4440 Bajaj Auto 180BSIV, Yellow colour.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Che Castro

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/8

¶14

Crl.R.C.No.477 of 2024

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The petitioner is the owner of passenger Auto bearing Registration

¶17

No.TN-02-AH-4440, which was seized by the respondent Police in Crime

¶18

No.133 of 2023 for offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Norcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). The petitioner filed a petition seeking return of property in Crl.M.P.No.9100 of 2023 before the learned Principal Special Judge, Special Court under EC &

¶19

NDPS Act, Chennai. The learned Principal Special Judge, by order dated 18.12.2023 dismissed the return of property petition, against which, the present revision has been filed.

¶20

2.The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner had

¶21

purchased the Auto by availing private finance. The vehicle was earlier on hypothecation with G.M.Finance. Thereafter, the petitioner purchased the vehicle. The petitioner is making his livelihood by renting his Auto. Prior to

¶22

the date of occurrence, one Srinivasan @ Kona Seenu/A2 took the Auto on

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/8

¶24

Crl.R.C.No.477 of 2024

¶25

monthly rental basis. The petitioner is not aware of A2's other acts. Later, the

¶26

petitioner came to know that on search of Auto, 1.500 kgs. of Ganja was

¶27

seized. From the date of seizure, the vehicle is kept in open exposing to vagaries of weather, further detention would make the vehicle unusable, rusted and it would become a scrap. The petitioner is ready to comply with any condition that this Court may impose while granting return of vehicle. It

¶28

is further submitted that this Court in Crl.R.C.No.1057 of 2023 by order dated 17.07.2023 granted return of vehicle to an accused involved in the offence of similar nature. Hence, he prays for return of property.

¶29

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the

¶30

respondent Police filed a counter and submitted that on 11.02.2023 at about

¶31

19.00 hours, the then Sub-Inspector of Police received a secret information

¶32

from the informant about the illegal sale of ganja. Then she along with the

¶33

Police team went to the place of occurrence, intercepted the Auto and found

¶34

accused in possession of 1.500 kgs of ganja. The Police team arrested the

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/8

¶36

Crl.R.C.No.477 of 2024

¶37

accused, recorded confession statement and the contraband was seized along

¶38

with Auto bearing Registration No.TN-02-AH-4440 under seizure mahazar in

¶39

presence of witnesses. Thereafter, a case was registered in Crime No.133 of 2023 for offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act

¶40

against the accused on 11.02.2023. Thereafter, the accused was sent to judicial custody on 11.02.2023 and the seized contraband and the Auto produced before the Principal Special Court under EC & NDPS Act Cases,

¶41

Chennai. Thereafter, the then Inspector of Police sent the samples of contraband to the Forensic Science Lab, Chennai for chemical analysis and the report obtained.

¶42

4.He further submitted that the petitioner, owner of the vehicle, filed a petition before the Court below in Crl.M.P.No.9100 of 2023 seeking return of vehicle BAJAJ AUTO 180BSIV, Yellow Colour bearing registration No.TN-02-AH-4440 and the same was dismissed on 18.12.2023.

¶43

Challenging the same, the present Criminal Revision Case has been filed. He

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/8

¶45

Crl.R.C.No.477 of 2024

¶46

further submitted that this Court in Crl.R.C(MD)No.41 of 2019, dated

¶47

16.06.2023 had given directions to the Special Court with regard to disposal

¶48

of the conveyance articles seized under the NDPS Act. In view of the above,

¶49

he prays for dismissal of the criminal revision case.

¶50

5.Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the

¶51

materials available on record, it is seen that the petitioner is the owner of the

¶52

vehicle and he is not an accused in this case, not involved in any case of similar nature. The petitioner let out the Auto for rent to A2/Srinivasan,

¶53

further no contraband seized from the petitioner. It is seen that from the date of seizure, the vehicle is kept in open space exposing to vagaries of weather, further detention of Auto would cause damage to the vehicle, in result, the value of the vehicle will get diminished and vehicle would become unusable and immobile. The Apex Court in the case of Sainaba vs. The State of Kerala and another in Criminal Appeal No.2005/2022 [SLP (CRL.)

¶54

No.72080/2022] following the judgment in the case of “Sunderbhai

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/8

¶56

Crl.R.C.No.477 of 2024

¶57

Ambalal Desai Versus State of Gujarat reported in 2002 10 SCC 283 ”

¶58

released the vehicle, involved in NDPS Act. The learned Additional Public

¶59

Prosecutor objected return of property by referring to the order of this Court in Crl.R.C.(MD).No.41 of 2019 dated 16.06.2023, it is seen that in the said

¶60

order, the decision of the Apex Court in Sainaba's case not referred. In view

¶61

of the decision of the Apex Court on this point as laid down which is binding

¶62

under Article 141 of the Constitution of India, hence, this Court is inclined to

¶63

grant return of Auto to the petitioner.

¶64

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the

¶65

impugned order dated 18.12.2023 passed by the learned Principal Special

¶66

Judge, Principal Special Court under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.9100 of 2023 is set aside. In view of the same, the learned Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court under EC & NDPS Act,

¶67

Chennai is directed to return the vehicle BAJAJ AUTO 180BSIV, Yellow

¶68