Petitioner sought modification of onerous bond conditions imposed while returning her seized car in a job racket case. The court reduced the bond to Rs.50,000 with two sureties, directed return of the vehicle with safeguards against alteration or alienation, and set aside the Magistrate's order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
Punitha Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep by:The Inspector of Police, CCB-I, Team 28, Job Racket Prevention, Chennai. ... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.4151 of 2024 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-For CCB, Cases, Egmore, Chennai, dated 30.01.2024 and modify the condition imposed to return the Maruti Suzuki Celerio VXL car bearing registration No.TN-07-CA-8759 with two keys, in Crl.M.P.No.2731 of 2024 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-For CCB Cases, Egmore, Chennai vide order dated 22.01.2024.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.G.Santhosh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioner/A2 has filed a return of property petition in
Crl.M.P.No.2731 of 2024 before the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate for CCB Cases, Egmore, Chennai seeking return of car viz., Maruti
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.1 of 8
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
Suzuki Celerio VXL car bearing registration No.TN-07-CA-8759. The
learned Magistrate, vide order, dated 22.01.2024 ordered to return the car to the petitioner with condition to execute a bond by the petitioner for Rs.3 lakhs and another person to execute a bond for the same sum and furnish the original document of immovable property or furnish a bank deposit receipt for a same value. To modify the said condition, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.4151 of 2024 before the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate for CCB Cases, Egmore, Chennai and the same was dismissed on 22.01.2024, against which the present criminal revision case is filed.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in Crime No.13 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police. The petitioner's husband and the defacto complainant had some civil dispute, for which, a false case projected as though the petitioner's husband collected money from the defacto complainant to secure job in electricity department. Further, the petitioner has got nothing to do with her husband's business. The respondent Police on coming to know that the petitioner's husband could not secure, arrested the petitioner on 28.10.2023 and she was in prison for sixty days and only on statutory bail, she came out from the prison.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2 of 8
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
He further submitted that the alleged date of occurrence was during the peak
COVID-19 period, at that point of time, no prudent person would give money, that too to secure a job in the public sector undertaking. The respondent Police joined the defacto complainant as a recovery agent and foisted a case against the petitioner and her husband. The petitioner has got nothing to do with the alleged transaction between the defacto complainant and her husband. It is submitted that the vehicle is kept in open space exposing to vagaries of weather, further detention of vehicle would make the vehicle unusable, rusted and it would become a scrap. The petitioner is ready to comply with any condition that this Court may impose while granting return of vehicle.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police filed counter submitting that that during investigation, the absconding accused/petitioner was arrested on 28.10.2023. In Police custody, the petitioner voluntarily comes to below mentioned articles submitted before the witnesses on 29.10.2023. Thereafter seized below mentioned articles and produced before the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate for CCB Cases, Egmore, Chennai on 01.11.2023 which is as follows:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.3 of 8
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
| S.No. | Serial No.of Seizure Mahazar |
Item | B.No. & Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | Maruthi Suzuki Celerio VXI Car No.TN- 07-CA-8759 with key (2 Nos) |
2370/2023 01.11.2023 |
| 2 | 1 | HP Pavilion Aero Laptop (Gold Colour) | 2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 3 | 2 | Think Laptop Lenovo (Black Colour) | 2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 4 | 3 | OPPO Phone (Model No.CPH2495) | 2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 5 | 4 | OPPO Phone (Model No.CPH1937) | 2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 6 | 5 | Samsung Cell Phone (Model No.Galaxy A33 5G) |
2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 7 | 7 | Income Tax Department Card No.ALYPP2341L (Original) |
2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 8 | 8 | ICICI Visa Debit Card No.4017041075067105 |
2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 9 | 9 | Indian Driving License, No.0720060011577 (Original) |
2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 10 | 13 | Pendrive (Sandisk – Red and Black Colour) Cruzer Blade 64 GB-1 |
2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
| 11 | 12 | Villa No.30, Casa Grande, House key-03 | 2370/2023 01/11/2023 |
4.He further submitted that the seized property in this case, was
partially allowed to return to the petitioner such as PAN Card (Original), Driving Licence (Original) and House key (4 Nos.) vide Crl.M.P.No.38 of 2024 on 04.01.2024. The petitioner again filed return of property petition
before the lower Court vide Crl.M.P.No.2731 of 2024. On 22.04.2024, the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4 of 8
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
lower Court partially allowed the petition and returned the car viz., Maruti
Suzuki Celerio VXL car bearing registration No.TN-07-CA-8759 with
condition to execute a bond by the petitioner for Rs.3 lakhs and another
petitioner is the wife of the prime accused A1 in this case. If the said car seized from the accused is returned, it may prejudice the trial of the case and
said properties are required during trial to be marked as material object. Thus, the petitioner's claim of falsely implicating as accused is not sustainable. Hence, he strongly objected for setting aside the impugned order.
5.Considering the submissions and on perusal of the materials, it is seen that in this case, the petitioner's/A1 husband is absconding. No doubt the petitioner was arrested and she was in prison for sixty days. It is not in dispute, the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle. Except this case, the vehicle not involved in any other case. It is seen that from the date of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.5 of 8
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
recovery, the vehicle is kept in open yard exposing to vagaries of weather and
thereby, the value of the vehicle is getting diminished. The Hon'ble Apex
Court in the case of “ Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Versus State of Gujarat reported in 2002 10 SCC 290 ”, had given guidelines in the cases of return of property to the owner.
6.In view of the above , this Court modifies the condition imposed in the order, dated 22.01.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.2731 of 2024 to the effect that the petitioner to execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate for CCB Cases, Egmore, Chennai. The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and give the copies of their Aadhaar Card. On further conditions that
(i)The respondent Police is directed to return the car viz., Maruti Suzuki Celerio VXL car bearing registration No.TN-07-CA-8759 to the petitioner.
(ii)T he petitioner shall not alter or alienate the vehicle in question till the completion of trial.
(iii)The petitioner shall take photograph of the vehicle and submit the same along with Compact Disc duly certified under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.6 of 8
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
(iv)The petitioner shall submit a self attested photostat copy of R.C.Book before the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, CCB Cases, Egmore, Chennai.
21.03.2024
Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes Neutral Citation: Yes/No vv2 To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.7 of 8
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
vv2
Crl.R.C.No.339 of 2024
21.03.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.8 of 8
1 issue framed by the court
Whether conditions imposed for return of a seized car to the petitioner should be modified pending trial.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Versus State of GujaratRelied on¶5
2002 10 SCC 290 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Punitha Ramalingam
State Rep by: The Inspector of Police, CCB-I, Team 28, Job Racket Prevention, Chennai
M.Nirmal Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
