Revision challenging a Family Court order directing payment of Rs.20,000 monthly maintenance (Rs.10,000 each) to the wife and minor son. With no representation for the petitioner on two occasions, the Court found no infirmity in the Trial Court's order and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.R.C. No.1931 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Crl.R.C. No.1931 of 2024
C. Lokesh
& Crl.M.P. No. 15781 of 2024 ..Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Criminal Revision under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS to set
aside the order dated 18.07.2023 passed in M.C. No. 453 of 2021 by the II Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner :: No appearance
O R D E R
When the matter was called on 13.11.2024, there was no
1\4
Crl.R.C. No.1931 of 2024
representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter is listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' today. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
15.11.2024
nv
To
2\4
Crl.R.C. No.1931 of 2024
The II Addl. Prl. Family Court, Chennai.
SUNDER MOHAN,J.
nv
Crl.R.C. No.1931 of 2024
3\4
Crl.R.C. No.1931 of 2024
15.11.2024
4\4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's order awarding Rs.10,000 per month maintenance to each respondent was infirm and should be set aside.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
C. Lokesh
Vidhyalakshmi
Minor L. Sakthi Pranav rep. by mother & Guardian Vidhyalakshmi
Sunder Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
