Allowed

A.Regunathan v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Oct 2024CRL RC/1626/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this revision case, the Court allowed the petition challenging the trial court's dismissal of a plea for return of original Fixed Deposit Receipts. The Court directed the return of the receipt since the case had been taken on file and final report filed.

What did the court decide?

Return of original IOB Fixed Deposit Receipt No.0268142 dated 27.01.2022 in reinvestment scheme for Rs.3,00,000/- to the petitioner.

A.Regunathan Vs Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL.R.C.No.1626 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 17.10.2024

¶4

CORAM: MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

¶5

Crl.R.C.No.1626 of 2024

A.Regunathan

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Inspector of Police CBI / ACB / Chennai RC0322022(A)0024 ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Revision Case filed under Section 438 r/w 447 of BNSS to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.4345 of 2023 on 26.05.2023 by the learned Principal Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases, VIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, and direct the respondent police to return the one original IOB Fixed Deposit Receipt No.0268142 dated 27.01.2022 in reinvestment scheme for Rs.3,00,000/- in FD A/c.No.099604000003192 in favour of A.Regunathan (02 sheets) to the petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jaikumar

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.K.Srinivasan Special Public Prosecutor (CBI Cases)

¶13

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

CRL.R.C.No.1626 of 2024

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition is filed challenging an order passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases, VIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, in Crl.M.P.No.4345 of 2023, which the petitioner had filed seeking return of his original IOB Fixed Deposit Receipt No.0268142 dated 27.01.2022 in Re-investment scheme for Rs.3,00,000/- in FD A/c. No.099604000003192 in favour of A.Regunathan (02 sheets) to the petitioner. The trial Court dismissed the petition on the ground that at the relevant time investigation was underway. Hence this Revision.

¶17

2.The prosecution filed its counter. Mr. K.Srinivasan, the learned Special Public Prosecutor (C.B.I) submitted that final report has been filed and the case has been taken on file in C.C.No.9 of 2024 by the VIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai and that the prosecution does not rely on this document. The said statement is recorded.

¶18

3.In view of the same, this Court allows this Revision Case. This Court also directs return of the said original IOB Fixed Deposit Receipt No.0268142 dated 27.01.2022 in Re-investment scheme for Rs.3,00,000/-

¶19

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CRL.R.C.No.1626 of 2024

¶21

in F.D.A/c.No.099604000003192 in favour of A.Regunathan (02 sheets) to the petitioner from whosoever who is in custody it is now.

¶22

17.10.2024

¶23

kas

¶24

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation

¶25

¶26

1.The Inspector of Police CBI / ACB / Chennai RC0322022(A)0024

¶27

2.The Principal Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases VIII Additional City Civil Court Chennai 3.The Public Prosecutor C.B.I. Cases High Court of Madras

¶28

N.SESHASAYEE, J.

¶29

kas

¶30

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

CRL.R.C.No.1626 of 2024

¶32

Crl.R.C.No.1626 of 2024

¶33

17.10.2024

¶34

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Regunathan v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Regunathan v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Anbazhagan Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Poongodai Vs State by

Sangeetha Vs State by

R.Mallika Vs the State Rep by Its

K. Suguna Vs Malleeswari

Dalmia Cements (Bharat) Ltd., Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep.