Allowed

Jeyaraman @ Jayaram v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Mar 2024CRL OP(MD)/789/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges of affray and hurt. Acknowledging the petitioner was absconding and that a warrant was issued without a summons, the Court allowed the petition and directed release upon execution of bond and sureties, pending appearance before the Magistrate within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner to execute bond for Rs.10,000 with two sureties; must appear before Magistrate within 15 days.

Jeyaraman @ Jayaram Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.789 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06.03.2024 PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

¶4

CRL OP(MD). No.789 of 2024

¶5

Jeyaraman @ Jeyaram

¶6

... Petitioner /Accused 6

¶7

¶8

The State rep. by the The Inspector of Police, Perungudi Police Station, Madurai District, Cr.No.103/2023.

¶9

... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : MR.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate.

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.R.SURESHKUMAR Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶13

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.103/2023 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the

¶16

respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b),

¶17

323, 324, 342 and 307 IPC in Crime No.103 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police,

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.789 of 2024

¶21

seeks anticipatory bail.

¶22

The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioner herein alleging that due to previous motive, the petitioner herein and other accused have attacked the defacto complainant's son with Aruval and caused severe injuries.

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that it is a six anticipatory bail petitions and the earlier five petitions filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court and seeks anticipatory bail.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner herein is absconding accused. He would further submit that without issuing summons the warrant was issued against him.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that without issuing summon warrant was issued against the petitioner by the trial Court, so this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶26

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai District on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

CRL OP(MD). No.789 of 2024

¶29

condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

¶30

Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the

¶31

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶32

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period

¶33

of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶34

sd/06/03/2024

¶35

/ TRUE COPY /

¶36

/03/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶37

TRP TO

¶38

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , THIRUMANGALAM,MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶39

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶40

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUNGUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

3/4

¶43

CRL OP(MD). No.789 of 2024

¶44

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶45

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.789 of 2024 Date :06/03/2024

¶46

SA/VR/SAR. /15.03.2024/4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

4/4

Jeyaraman @ Jayaram v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeyaraman @ Jayaram v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vellaiyammal Memorial Rural Development Trust, Vs Seenivasan

Shri Balaji Pandithar Sathiram, Vs Tamil Nadu Government

Fathima kani Vs Hajammal Begum

P.K.Bala Prasath Vs S.J. Brishma

N.Seetharaman Vs R.Rajavalli

Arunthathi Alias Jeyanthi Vs R. Sowmiya