The National Lok Adalat allowed a criminal original petition (appeal) following a joint compromise memo filed by both parties, wherein they agreed to withdraw all filed cases.
The criminal original petition is allowed based on a recorded joint compromise memo; petitioners consent to withdraw all filed cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.2006 and 2007 of 2023
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTE, MADURAI
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625023
Saturday the 14th day of September 2024 NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD
(Chapter VI and u/s 21 or Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)
Presided Over by
The Honourable Mrs Justice S.ANANTHI (Retd.)
and
Members
Mr.K.R.Mathurasekaran, District Judge(Retired) , Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen, Advocate
CRL OP(MD) No.5920 of 2023
(Appeal against the judgment and decree passed on in CC.19/2020 on the file of the DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILATHIKULAM)
1.Sankar
2.Mariappan
3.Meenakshi
4.Ramar
... Petitioners
Versus
The Inspector of Police All Women Police station, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District. Crime No. 6 of 2018 Subbulakshmi ... Respondents
This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties present. The counsel
for the Petitioners Mr.A.S.Vaigunth and the counsel for second respondent Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties and with the assistance of the Bench, both sides consented for settlement.
1/3
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.2006 and 2007 of 2023
AWARD
Both parties are present. They filed a joint compromise memo stating that they are withdrawing all the cases filed by them.
this criminal original petition is allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order.
4.Ramar
Counsel for petitioners
Subbulakshmi
Counsel for the Respondent
This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.
The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamilnadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.
The Original of the award shall be place in the court record and copy of the award, kept with High Court Legal Services Committee and one copy each is furnished to both parties free of cost.
In agreement of the above, both parties and their counsel have affixed their signatures/ thumb impressions in presence of the Lok Adalat Bench admitting the terms and today conditions and accordingly, the award is passed.
2/3
C.R.P.(MD)Nos.2006 and 2007 of 2023
MEMBER
JUDGE
MEMBER
To: The Parties/Advocate concerned Copy To
Typed By
PA To The Hon'ble Judges Rmi
3/3
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sankar
Mariappan
Meenakshi
Ramar
Subbulakshmi
S.ANANTHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
