Petitioner sought anticipatory bail for offences of cheating and forgery relating to a fake government job appointment obtained by paying large sums. This was his third such application. The court found no change in circumstances and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL OP(MD). No.5075 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 02/04/2024
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
CRL OP(MD). No.5075 of 2024
Nawas Ahamed, ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs. The Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District. (Crime No.329/2023). . ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Duraipandian,Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.329/2024 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner/A1, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 420, 406, 468, 465 and 120(B) IPC, in Crime No.329 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/3
CRL OP(MD). No.5075 of 2024
2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant lodged a complaint stating that one Senthil, who is A2 herein is working in the Transport Department, Palani. On coming to know that the de-facto complainant's daughter is searching for job, he promised to arrange job for her stating that one Navas Ahamed, Venkatesh and Mani are running an Institution called 'Benchmark Global Education and Carrier', for arranging job in the Government Departments. On 15/02/2019, they demanded Rs.20,00,000/- for arranging appointment order. An advance amount of Rs.2,00,000/- was paid. Later, Rs.1,30,000/- was paid. On 26/06/2019, he received an appointment order, that was taken to Delhi and from there to various places. On 10/07/2019, he gave Rs.16,70,000/- to Senthil and Navas Ahamed. Later, they received an appointment order, on 06/01/2022 with the signature of the Department officials. They came to know that they were cheated and the above said appointment order was fake one. On that account, he lodged a complaint, upon which, a case in Crime No.329 of 2023 has been registered for the offences stated above.
3.This is the third anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner, who is A1.
4.Considering the grievous nature of the allegation and the amount involved in this matter, the earlier applications filed by the petitioner along with co-accused were dismissed by this Court. Now, I find no change of circumstances to entertain this https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/3
CRL OP(MD). No.5075 of 2024
petition.
5.In the result, all the criminal original petition is dismissed.
sd/02/04/2024 / TRUE COPY /
/04/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TM TO
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5075 of 2024 Date :02/04/2024 PKP/VR/SAR /12.04.2024/ 3P/ 3C
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to A1 in a job-racketeering cheating case where earlier bail applications were dismissed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nawas Ahamed
The Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District
G.ILANGOVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
