In the absence of the petitioner, this court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC filed to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16783 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.12.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16783 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.11226 & 11227 of 2022
S.Thowlath Begam
...Petitioner/Sole Accused
Vs.
P.Subbu ...Respondent/De-facto complainant
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records of the complaint in C.C.No.56 of 2022 on the file of the Fast Track Court, Karaikudi, against the petitioner for the alleged offences under Section 138 of N.I. Act 1881 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.12.2024, there
was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, there is no
appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/3
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16783 of 2022
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition are closed.
11.12.2024
Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TSG To 1.The Judge, The Fast Track Court, Karaikudi. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2/3
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16783 of 2022
N.ANAND VENKATESH.J.,
TSG
Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16783 of 2022
Dated : 11.12.2024
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act should be admitted when the petitioner is absent.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S. Thowlath Begam
P. Subbu
N. Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
