Accused petitioned to quash proceedings in S.T.C.No.446 of 2018 before the Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai. The Magistrate reported the case had been disposed of on 22.04.2018, so the petition was dismissed with liberty to file a quash petition citing the correct S.T.C. number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14959 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Crl.O.P(MD). No.14959 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.7149 and 7150 of 2020
Vs.
1
PRAYER:
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14959 of 2020
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in connection with S.T.C.No.446 of 2018 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Poornachandran
For Respondents : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1
: No appearance for R2
ORDER
This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the proceeding in S.T.C.No.446 of 2018, on the file of the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Aruppukottai.
Magistrate, Aruppukottai, to submit a report regarding the stage of the case in S.T.C.No.446 of 2018.
2
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14959 of 2020
16.02.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sbn
To
3
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14959 of 2020
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
sbn
Crl.O.P(MD). No.14959 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos.7149 and 7150 of 2020
16.02.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Should the proceedings in S.T.C.No.446 of 2018 be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., given the trial court's report on the case stage?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Udhayasooriyan
Ambuli Kanagaraj
Sundarraj @ Perusali
Sundarraj
Subburaj
Ramasamy
K.K.Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
