Anticipatory bail sought by owner of a lodge allegedly used for prostitution in Crime No.560 of 2023 under ITP Act and Section 370 IPC. Court declined bail, noting he owned the lodge and was accused of activities there; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.990 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.990 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioner/first accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 3(2)(a), 4(1), 5(1)(a) ITP Act and 370 of IPC in Crime No.560 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.
19.02.2024
vsg
1
Crl.O.P.No.990 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
vsg
Crl.O.P.No.990 of 2024
19.02.2024
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the lodge owner accused of offences under the ITP Act and Section 370 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner/first accused
Respondent police
C.V.Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
