Dismissed

Jayakodi v. State Rep by

Madras HC22 Mar 2024CRL OP/9384/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought quashing of a charge sheet in a POCSO special court case. Counsel for the petitioner, lacking client instructions and with an endorsement to withdraw, sought permission to withdraw. The High Court dismissed the criminal original petition as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed as withdrawn and connected Crl.M.P. closed.

Jayakodi Vs State Rep by — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.9384 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.9384 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No. 5469 of 2022

Jayakodi

... Petitioner

Versus

The State, rep. by Inspector of Police AWPS, Cuddalore, Cuddalore Dt. (Crime No.07 of 2019)

¶11

Sasi ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Special Sessions Case No. 99 of 2019 on the file of Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases under POCSO Act, Cuddalore and quash the same.

¶13

Page No.1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Crl.O.P.No.9384 of 2022

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr. N.U.Prassanna For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the charge sheet made in Spl. C.C. No.99 of 2019 pending on the file of Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases under POCSO Act, Cuddalore.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as there is no instructions from the client regarding their appearance, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶20

Page No.2 of 4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Crl.O.P.No.9384 of 2022

¶23

In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the

¶24

learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

22.03.2024

rpp

Inspector of Police, AWPS, Cuddalore, Cuddalore Dt.

¶29

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶30

Page No.3 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.9384 of 2022

¶33

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶34

rpp

¶35

CRL.O.P.No.9384 of 2022

¶36

22.03.2024

¶37

Page No.4 of 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Jayakodi v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayakodi v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Chidambaram Vs State Rep by

Inspector of Police Vs Rajesh Malhotra

Irshad Ali Abibouraguimane Vs the State Rep by Its

Krishnan Vs the State Rep by Its

Ms Casa Grande Coimbatore LLP Vs the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Balaammal Vs Senthilkumar