Allowed

Ilamparithy v. State Rep. by Its

Madras HC8 Apr 2024CRL OP/7159/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail petition by an accused arrested with 250 grams of ganja in Crime No. 23 of 2024 under NDPS Act and other provisions. Considering the period of incarceration and absence of previous cases, the Madras High Court granted bail subject to conditions including bonds, sureties, daily police reporting for two months and a monetary deposit.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties (one blood surety), subject to conditions including daily reporting for two months and deposit of Rs.15,000.

Ilamparithy Vs State Rep. by Its — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.04.2024

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7159 of 2024

Ilamparithy

... Petitioner

Vs.

State Rep by. The Sub Inspector of Police Thavalakuppam Police station, Puducherry. Crime No. 23 of 2024

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.,

¶12

pleased to enlarge the petitioner in the above crime No. 23 of 2024, on the file of the respondent.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ezhilbalaji For Respondent : Mr.M.V.Ramachandramurthy Additional Public prosecutor (Ponducherry) assited by Ms. M.Thamizhmani

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.02.2024 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections and 77 of Juvenila Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 34 of IPC, 20 (B)(II)(A)of NDPS Act , 8 (c ) of NDPS Act of 1985 in crime No.

¶17

23 of 2024 on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

¶18

The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police found

¶19

the petitioners along with other accused persons were in alleged illegal possession of 250 grams of Ganja. Hence, the case.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. On the other side, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that the 250 grams of Ganja seized from the accused persons.

¶21

Considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and also there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶23

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties ( one must be a blood surety), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, (Under NDPS Act), Puducherry, and on further conditions that:

¶24

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶25

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two months. Further, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the credit of registered Advocate Clerk Association, Puducherry, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/ receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioners;

¶26

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶28

3/5

¶29

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶30

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶31

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶32

08.04.2024

¶33

pbl

¶34