Allowed

Thasthigar v. State Rep by

Madras HC19 Jan 2024CRL OP/698/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crime No.433 of 2024 for offences under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, and 324. The order imposed strict conditions including bond execution, daily police reporting, and a prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence, with reference to P.K.Shaji.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was released on anticipatory bail by executing a bond for Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of daily police reporting and adherence to judicial guidelines.

Thasthigar Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.698 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.698 of 2024

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶4

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.433 of 2023, registered by the respondent police for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 of IPC r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002.

¶5

2.It is stated that the petitioner had given a complaint against

¶6

the defacto complainant. The petitioner and the defacto complainant are neighbours and there was a dispute between them owing to a construction which escalated into violence.

¶7

3.Taking all the factors into consideration, I am inclined to

¶8

grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

¶9

4.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai, on condition that the

¶10

petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

¶11

Page 1 of 4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Crl.O.P.No.698 of 2024

¶14

Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶15

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶16

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

¶17

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶18

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶19

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the

¶20

Page 2 of 4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Crl.O.P.No.698 of 2024

¶23

petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶24

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶25

19.01.2024

¶26

ata

¶27

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶28

ata

¶29

Page 3 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Crl.O.P.No.698 of 2024

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.698 of 2024

¶33

19.01.2024

¶34

Page 4 of 4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Thasthigar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thasthigar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Venkatesan Vs Inspector of Police

Appu @ Deepak Vs State Rep by

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State Rep by

Shanmugam Desabban Vs Inspector of Police

Surender Vs the State Rep. by

Manikandan Vs State Rep. by Its