Disposed

D.Rajan v. the State Rep by

Madras HC26 Mar 2024CRL OP/6860/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought bail in a house-break and theft case involving stolen gold jewellery. Stolen property was recovered and a final report filed. Considering the period of incarceration, the Madras High Court granted bail subject to bonds with two sureties, daily police reporting and other conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, daily reporting at 10.30 a.m., no absconding or tampering.

D.Rajan Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.Nos.6860 & 7209 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.Nos.6860 & 7209 of 2024

¶7

D.Rajan ..Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.6860 of 2024 1.D.Siva Vinayagam 2.B.Vighnesh ..Petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.7209 of 2024

¶8

Vs.

¶9

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.619 of 2023). ...Respondent in both Crl.O.Ps

¶10

COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.619 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.

¶11

In both Crl.O.Ps.

¶12

For Petitioners : M/s.M.Kalyani For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Crl.O.P.Nos.6860 & 7209 of 2024

¶15

COMMON ORDER

¶16

The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial

¶17

custody on 23.11.2023 for the offences originally registered by the respondent Police under Sections 380, 454, 457 IPC and later, altered to Sections 380 and 457 IPC in Crime No.619 of 2023 on the file of the respondent, seek bail.

¶18

2.The petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.6860 of 2024 is arrayed as A1 and the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.7209 of 2024 are arrayed as A2 and A3.

¶19

3.The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons had broke open the door of the house of the defacto complainant and stolen gold jewellery of nearly 12 sovereigns.

¶20

4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) stated that the stolen properties had been recovered. He further stated that there are 29 previous cases as against A1 and there are 7 previous cases as against A2 and A3 respectively. He also stated that the investigation has been completed and final report had been filed and it had been taken cognizance as C.C.No.8 of 2024 by the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet.

¶21

5.Taking all other factors into consideration and the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners subject

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.Nos.6860 & 7209 of 2024

¶25

to the following conditions:

¶26

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/ - (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet, and on further conditions that:

¶27

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶28

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶29

[c]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶30

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶31

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of

¶32

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Crl.O.P.Nos.6860 & 7209 of 2024

¶34

Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶35

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

26.03.2024

vkr

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet.

¶40

The Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶41

3.The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District.

¶42

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶43

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN. J.

¶44

vkr

¶45

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

Crl.O.P.Nos.6860 & 7209 of 2024

¶47

Crl.O.P.Nos.6860 & 7209 of 2024

¶48

26.03.2024

¶49

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

D.Rajan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Rajan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajagurunathan Vs Inspector of Police

Deepika Vs State by

Kuttikrishnan Vs State Rep by

Kumaravel @ Potti Vs the State Rep. by

Poovarasan Vs Inspector of Police

R.Ragul Vs the State Rep. by