Allowed

Senthilkumar v. State, Rep. by

Madras HC1 Feb 2024CRL OP/634/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought by accused 3 and 4 in a case involving alleged cheating in a spa licence arrangement, threats and assault. Considering their limited overt acts, the court granted anticipatory bail with conditions including daily reporting to police for three weeks and bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily reporting for three weeks.

Senthilkumar Vs State, Rep. by — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.634 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.634 of 2024 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶3

The petitioners/A3 and A4, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b),420,506(ii) of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 in Crime No. 5 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.

¶4

2 . It is the case of the defacto complainant that he is already running a spa and wanted to start another spa business. For this purpose it is stated that a sum of Rs.18,50,515/- had been handed over to A1 to organise to open a Spa and to get licence. However, A1 had obtained license in the name of one stranger, Arun Kumar. The defacto complainant had thereafter tried to get return back the money paid. It is stated that the petitioners had threatened the defacto complainant over phone and assaulted him.

¶5

3. Taking into consideration the limited overt act as against these petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶6

4 . Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to

¶7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶8

Crl.O.P.No.634 of 2024

¶9

the satisfaction of this Court concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶10

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶11

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

¶12

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶13

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶14

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶15

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

01.02.2024

smn

1/2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Crl.O.P.No.634 of 2024

¶21

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶22

smn

¶23

Crl.O.P.No.634 of 2024

¶24

01.02.2024 1/2

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Senthilkumar v. State, Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthilkumar v. State, Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Veeraviswamithiran Vs State Rep by

Rekha Vs State Rep. by

Baiju Vs Inspector of P Olice

Prabhu @ Nattamai Prabhu @ Sivadhasan Vs State Rep.by

Sakadevan.B Vs State Rep.by

Paramasivam Vs the State of Tamilnadu