Allowed

P.Pandiyan v. State Rep by

Madras HC4 Apr 2024CRL OP/5555/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in a case of alleged illegal possession and transport of 300 liquor bottles from Pondicherry to Madurai under the TNP Act. The court granted anticipatory bail with conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, a Rs.20,000 deposit, daily reporting for eight weeks, and non-tampering.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to specified conditions including Rs.20,000 deposit and eight weeks' daily police reporting.

P.Pandiyan Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.5555 of 2024

¶2

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

¶3

Crl.O.P.No.5555 of 2024

¶4

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the

¶5

respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 4(1)(aaa), 4(1-A) and 14 A of TNP Act, in Crime No.166 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶6

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 300 liquor bottles and transported the same from Pondicherry to Madurai through his vehicle. Hence, the complaint.

¶7

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and no way connected with the alleged offence. He further submits that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶8

Page 1 of 4

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

Crl.O.P.No.5555 of 2024

¶11

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 300 liquor bottles through his vehicle. He further submits that the petitioner has one previous case pending against him. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶12

5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsels, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶13

6 . Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the

¶14

event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Vanoor on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶15

Page 2 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.O.P.No.5555 of 2024

¶18

(a)the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) to the credit of the Advocate Clerk Association, Kancheepuram within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

¶19

(b)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶20

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, for a period of eight weeks;

¶21

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶22

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Page 3 of 4

¶25

Crl.O.P.No.5555 of 2024

¶26

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶27

drl

¶28

[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶29

[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

¶30

04.04.2024

¶31

drl

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.5555 of 2024

¶33

Page 4 of 4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Pandiyan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Pandiyan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rani Vs Forest Range Officer

Usman Sheriff Vs State Rep.by

Gummidipudi Balasubramaniyam @ Vijay Vs State, Rep. by

Ismayil Vs the State Rep. by

Srikanth Vs State Rep by

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State Rep.by