The single judge allowed three Criminal Original Petitions, granting leave to the petitioners to file Criminal Appeals against judgment reversing their conviction and sentence from a fast track court.
Leave granted to petitioner to prefer appeals; Registry directed to number appeals and list for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.Nos.4648, 4649 & 4650 of 2018 in Crl.A.SR.Nos.53388, 53384 & 53386 of 2017
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
The present Criminal Original Petitions have been filed seeking to grant leave to file Criminal Appeals against the judgments dated 09.10.2017 passed in C.A.Nos.61, 60 and 59 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vellore, whereby the conviction and sentence imposed on the respondent herein by judgment dated 24.11.2016 passed in C.C.Nos.187, 186 and 185 of 2013 on the file of Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Vellore has been reversed.
2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits filed in support of these petition, these petitions stand allowed and leave is granted to the petitioner to prefer appeals.
3. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeals, if the papers are otherwise in order and list the same for admission.
19.06.2024
sp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to prefer Criminal Appeals against conviction and sentence judgments should be granted.
Petitioner in Crl.O.P.Nos. 4648, 4649 & 4650
Respondent (Convict)
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
