Allowed

Tamilarasan D v. The Inspector Of Police

Madras HC28 Feb 2024CRL OP/4594/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehended arrest for transporting river sand, subject to daily police reporting, surety bond, deposit, and conditions to not tamper with evidence or abscond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with conditions including executing a bond with two sureties, daily reporting, depositing security, and refraining from absconding or tampering with evidence.

Tamilarasan D Vs The Inspector Of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.4594 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.4594 of 2024

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶4

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 430 of IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Development Regulation Act 1957 in Crime No.42 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶5

2 . The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found to transporting ¼ units of river sand.

¶6

3 . In view of these particular facts, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶7

4 . Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, Vaaniyampadi, Thirupathur District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶8

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶9

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

Crl.O.P.No.4594 of 2024

¶12

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶13

vsg

¶14

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.

¶15

[c] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- to the District Revenue Officer, Thirupathur District. Two weeks time is granted for deposit the said amount from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶17

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶18

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶19

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶20

28.02.2024

¶21

vsg

¶22

Crl.O.P.No.4594 of 2024

¶23

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tamilarasan D v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilarasan D v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Vadivel Pandi Vs State by

Logeeswaran @ Karthikeyan Vs State Rep. by

Mariyappan Vs State Rep. by

Vinothkumar @ Vinoth Vs the State Represented by

D.K.Deepu Vs the State Rep.by

Selvaraj @ Selvam Vs State Rep.by