other accused harassed the defacto complainant / 2nd respondent by demanding dowry. But as per the final report and statements of witnesses, it has been exaggerated in the complaint that the petitioners demanded dowry. Therefore, even as per the Prosecution, these petitioners have not demanded dowry. Therefore, the matrimonial dispute has given a colour of criminal case. Once the allegation of demand of dowry is false, the alleged allegations in respect of Sections 498(A) and 506(i) also creates serious doubts and even as per the FIR, charge sheet and the statements of witnesses, there are general and omnibus allegations and there is no any specific allegations as against each accused. As per the statements of witnesses and the FIR, these petitioners along with other accused have entered into the house of the defacto complainant and assaulted the 2nd respondnet, the 1st petitioner slapped the 2nd respondent on her cheek, the 2nd accused pulled her saree, the 2nd petitioner pulled her hair and the 4th accused kicked on her stomach. These allegations are vague and not specific. The defacto complainant did not go to the hospital after the alleged occurrence and she did not sustain any injuries due to the above said acts.
