For the property owned by Anjana Rani, A-1 entered into a sale agreement with the complainant in the month of January 2016, describing himself as an agreement holder with Anjana Rani and received totally a sum of Rs.1,68,00,000/-. After much persuasion, A1 returned only Rs.40,00,000/-. Thereafter, A-1 prepared Power of Attorney deed dated 02/07/2016 as if Anjana Rani had given power to Rajeshkumar (A-2) for negotiation and sale of the property. In this document, A-1 has signed as scribe as well as notary public and written ‘executed before him’. This Power of Attorney document is a document fabricated by A-1 and A-2, forging the signature of Anjanarani. Based on this forged Power of Attorney deed, sale agreement by Rajeshkumar (A-2) in favour of the complainant and his wife executed during the month of July, 2016 and part sale considerations were received from the complainant on different dates either by A-1 or by A-2 and necessary endorsement made on the back of the sale agreement . The payments were received by A-1 and A-2 suppressing the fact that Anjana rani had settled the property in favour of her children on 14/07/2016 and got the settlement deed registered. In the