Two accused in a theft case involving a rented godown sought anticipatory bail, offering to deposit an amount. The court declined bail, noting further investigation was needed into their involvement in other cases, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.3780 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.3780 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The Petitioners/A1 and A2 in Crime No.40 of 2024 registered by the Respondent Police for the offences under Sections 454 and 380 of IPC, seek anticipatory bail.
Page 1 of 3
Crl.O.P.No.3780 of 2024
grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein. Accordingly, this
Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
20.02.2024
ssa/mkn2
Page 2 of 3
Crl.O.P.No.3780 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
ssa/mkn2
Crl.O.P.No.3780 of 2024
20.02.2024
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners/A1 and A2 accused of house trespass and theft.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners/A1 and A2 in Crime No.40 of 2024
Respondent Police
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
